If you haven't already seen our page of headlines on junk email or our page about how individuals can discourage spam, it may be worth reading them first.
People responsible for corporate security may also want to read our page on cookies, because the threats to individual privacy it describes also threaten the confidentiality of some commercial activities. One way to reduce the potentially damaging flow of information from web browsers (including email addresses in some cases) is to install the Internet Junkbuster.
The many ISPs who offer our banner-blocking proxy find that it saves them bandwidth, speeds browsing for their customers, and improves customer retention (once you've browsed the web ad-free, it's difficult to go back).
ISPs and other companies and organizations suffer badly because of spam. If all the work hours lost by people processing junk email were added up, the bill would be substantial. However, large organizations are in an excellent position to put an end to it, because they have the resources for concerted action against it. This page describes some ways that this might be done. We are not offering legal advice in any capacity: each organization must decide for itself what to do
The word ``affiliates'' is used below to cover employees, volunteers,
and customers with email accounts on your company's computers.
The person issuing such an offer should be of
sufficient rank to make it clear to both spammers and affiliates
that the issuer has the authority to speak on behalf of the whole organization.
The CEO or managing director might be appropriate.
It might be worth signing all such messages using a cryptographic tool such as
PGP,
to discourage spammers from claiming they received a different message.
I write as a fully authorized
representative of [Insert Organization Name],
to which I refer with the words ``our organization'', ``us,'' ``we''
and ``our'' in this document.
We do not want to receive bulk uninvited solicitations
by email (``Junk Email'')
to any addresses ending in the domain [ourorganization.com].
By ``bulk'' I mean the practice of sending more than three
identical or similar messages to addressees
of who one or more have email accounts affiliated with our organization.
This practice costs us money due to telecommunications charges
and the time spent by our affiliates processing this email.
If you send us any Junk Email other than on the terms of the offer set out
in the following seven points,
we will take this to mean that you plan to use
what was offered you without paying for it.
If you ever try to do this we reserve our
right to take any action available to
us without further reference to you.
Actions available to us include
taking proceedings against you for negligence or breach of contract,
which may result in substantial damages being awarded against you by a court.
The unauthorized use of our computing facilities
may even be a crime.
If you send us any Junk Email
without express prior written consent from me or an officer
of our organization
this will be taken as your acceptance of this offer.
Each individual affiliate may give you permission in writing
to send email to him or her.
Take notice that our organization is unwilling to receive or process bulk
solicitations freely by email, and that if you send such email
you may incur certain legal and financial burdens.
The copyright of some or all of
the above text is held by Junkbusters Corporation
and is used here in accordance with the GNU General Public License,
copies of which are available at www.junkbusters.com or from the Free
Software Foundation, Inc.,
59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA
Although it may sound strange at first, organizations should consider that some of their affiliates may object to anyone telling others not to send them email. America Online has stated that some AOL members have told them they want to receive spam, so they made blocking an user-controlled option on their mail handler. Their recent litigation against a spam factory has shown that the legal issues may not be clear cut. We can't solve these issues, but we offer a few observations to consider. Employers are in a somewhat different position from ISPs.
Many companies discard physical junk mail before it gets from their mail rooms to their employees, so they will probably do the same for spam. Some employees might have objections to this, probably based more on principle than law or any real desire to receive spam.
An ISP is in a different position: its customers are not its employees, and some might have a stronger argument about being ``unwillingly deprived of the opportunity to receive materials,'' as the Supreme Court said of the U.S. Post Office. ISPs aren't common carriers, so they could make it is a condition of service that they have the right to block spam, leaving anyone who doesn't like it to switch to another ISP. An extreme solution would be to offer customers the option of an email address in a separate subdomain where spam is not discouraged. Our guess is that few people would choose it.
An ISP or online company with a reputation as a popular target for spammers has a disadvantage in the marketplace, but one that can show its vigilance in protecting its customers from spam has an advantage.
Fighting spam is an expensive, time-consuming chore. We don't think that suing spammers will ever be a profitable activity. But organizations should consider that if they are more effective in deterring spam, they will improve the quality of life of the people who use their computer systems. We hope that every company will demonstrate by its actions that spam is not an acceptable use of the Internet.
Home · Next · Site Map · Legal · Privacy · Cookies · Banner Ads · Telemarketing · Mail · Spam · Opt OutCopyright © 1996-2005 Guidescope Inc ®. Copying and distribution permitted under the GNU General Public License. 2005/01/15 http://www.junkbusters.com/organizations.html