Clicking on a book title to an online bookseller with a better-than-average privacy policy, but sadly, your privacy is probably better protected if you borrow the book from a library or purchase it in a physical store.
Ads seem to work on the very advanced principle that a small pellet or pattern in a noisy, redundant barrage of repetition will gradually assert itself. Ads push the principle of noise all the way to the plateau of persuasion.
Aldous Huxley commented that the classic cry of Patrick Henry that he wanted either liberty or death now sounds melodramatic. Instead today, Huxley contended, we are more apt to demand, ``Give me television and hamburgers but don't bother me with the responsibilities of liberty.'' (p.13)
Here were people tut-tutting about invasions of privacy on the one hand, and on the other demanding that the royal family line up and weep for the TV cameras.
No rights can be dearer... than exemptions from unseasonable invasions on [one's] time by the coarse-minded and ignorant.
A man always is to be himself the judge of how much of his mind he will show to other men; even to those he would have work along with him. There are impertinent inquiries made: your rule is: to leave the inquirer uninformed on that matter; not, if you can help it, misinformed; but precisely as dark as he was!
Statutes must appeal to more than material welfare. Wages won't satisfy, be they never so large. Nor houses; nor lands; nor coupons, though they fall as thick as the leaves of autumn. Man has a spiritual nature... recognise the immortal worth and dignity of man.(Quoted in Lend Me Your Ears by
It's all right letting yourself go, as long as you can get yourself back.(If you have a credible date and source for this statement, please tell us.)
Western society has accepted as unquestionable a technological imperative that is quite as arbitrary as the most primitive taboo: not merely the duty to foster invention and constantly to create technological novelties, but equally the duty to surrender to these novelties unconditionally just because they are offered, without respect to their human consequences. One may without exaggeration now speak of technological compulsiveness...This doctrine is still prevalent; it has recently been expressed by Andy Grove for example. Simon Ramo, who was the R in TRW, wrote in Century of Mismatch ``We must now plan on sharing the earth with machines. ... ...we want what the machines can furnish, and so we must compromise. We must alter the rules of society so that we and they can be compatible.'' (New York: David McKay, 1970, p.12) In a thoughtful rebuttal titled Controlling Technology, (IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 13(1), Spring 1994) Norman Balabanian wrote that ``As late as 1933, the motto of the Chicago World's Fair, emblazoned over the main entrance, was: Science Finds - Industry Applies - Man Conforms.''This situation was well characterized by the mathematician John von Neumann: ``Technological possibilities are irresistible to man. If man can go to the moon, he will. If he can control the climate, he will.'' ...
There is a simple way of establishing the downright absurdity--or more accurately the menacing irrationality---of accepting such technological compulsiveness; and that is to carry von Neumann's dictum to its logical conclusion: If man has the power to exterminate all life on earth, he will.
This world, which has never before been ready to accept universally any of the universal faiths offered for its salvation, is apparently prepared to embrace the religion of science and technology without reservation.
To take a fairly simple example, many drivers respond to an emergency situation by a sudden application of the brakes, which can easily make the brakes lock and lead to a loss of steering control. ... There are two approaches to solving this problem: either trying to teach drivers that during emergencies they must not resort to a sudden application of the brakes, which because of their design, will lock; or trying to persuade the manufacturers to provide cars with anti-locking brakes. It is not difficult to choose the more feasible approach.(Second edition (1972), p. 291. Both editions seem to be out of print.)
This is a central point - this belief we are one person. We are not. We are many people. We're one way with somebody, an entirely different way for somebody else. Yet we go on believing, in everything we do, that we are just being ourselves, the same person we always are. It is not true! And when we are caught in a certain act, when others insist on seeing us in just one light we begin to realize how unjust it is. Our whole existence cannot be summed up because of something that took place once. She is the sadist now. She caught me in a place where she should not have known me, just as I should have been nothing to her. And now that one shameful but brief moment is all I am. My only reality.
Addressed to ``Resident'' these [mail-order catalogs] tumble through the mail slot all year long but most profusely about three months before national holidays associated with ``gifting.'' Despite their occasional complaints about junk mail, Resident secretly likes receiving these catalogs, for they suggest that someone out there believes he has money and recognizes that he has the power to choose.
Smithers: If Mr. Burns wants to see a stranger he will look at him through a high-powered telescope.
Burns: Smithers, what's going on? How dare you interrupt my lime ricky?!
Barbara: ...Do you remember how we implored the County Council to stop him from writing Bodger's Whisky in letters of fire against the sky so that the poor drink-ruined creatures of the Embankment could not wake up from their snatches of sleep without being reminded of their deadly thirst by that wicked sky sign?
Go, my songs, to the lonely and the unsatisfied,
Go also to the nerve-wracked, go to the enslaved-by-convention,
Bear to them my contempt for their oppressors.
Most of these books don't mention privacy, but the processes of change
that they study are relevant to the shifting treatment of privacy
in Corporate America.
Market fundamentalists try to disregard social values by arguing that whatever those values are, they find expression in market behavior. For instance, if people want to take care of others or protect the environment they can express their sentiments by spending money on these ends... This argument is false. (p. 196)Soros didn't mention privacy, but his words apply exactly to some of the current public discourse on it.
``I then tried to persuade a large magazine to sell us a bound-in reply card with our ad. The publisher resisted the idea as ``intrusive.'' Intrusive was, of course, just what I wanted.
Copyright © 1996-2005 Guidescope Inc ®. Copying and distribution permitted under the GNU General Public License. 2005/01/15 http://www.junkbusters.com/books.html